Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sectionalism Archive's avatar

Good post. Not a lot of space for Buddhism in the modern west. Buddhists have no political influence in the West, unlike Hindus and Jews. Buddhism is too alien from Christianity to offer an olive branch to Western Conservatives, but at the same time it finds itself fighting the same Islamic civilization that the Western Left will defend to the bitter end. JuBu is no longer necessary for hippies because they have completed he Cult of Psychoanalysis that was still a work in progress in the 1970s. Also, a lot of Hippies went anti-woke, and are now anti-vax "Orthodox Christian Mystic" conspiracy theorists. And as a cherry on top, the Kung Fu genre is completely dead. A lot of Americans actually believed that Kung Fu could give you superhuman combat abilities until MMA became popular (albeit, I think MMA is not really that accurate a representation of the "best" fighting style)

Expand full comment
CyberpunkSvengali's avatar

Good piece. Close parallels with its cousin Hinduism and its changing reception in the west. From yoga, meditation and Upanishads to cow worship and casteism as India and the Indian diaspora’s politics has changed. Indeed, it’s the NatCons who’re willing to see actually-existing political Hinduism as it is. That being said, the Tibetans do have every right to craft their own path to modernity. The argument against ‘theocracy’ (a common Chinese argument that you seem to echo) is real, but not the one against Tibetan sovereignty and self-determination.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts